notes: 584
1 year ago
science medical research pro-choice pro-life reproductive rights abortion
ellavemia-deactivated20121211
Premature baby brains can't tell pain from touch

ellavemia:

The next time you see anti-choice (edit, typo) propaganda like “Dairy of An Unborn Child” (sic), She’s a Child not a “Choice”, kids with tape on their mouths that says “Life” who believe they’re making some kind of statement, kids who have no world experience sacrificing soft drinks and candy Until Abortion Ends, or any of the plentiful anti-choice pictures and poems from the fetus’ point of view that clutter our Tumblr dashboards which usually start out with “Dear mommy…” step back and consider this.

New research from University College London has shown that premature baby brains can’t tell pain from touch.Not until 35 to 37 weeks – just before a fetus would normally be born – can the developing brain tell pain stimuli from touch stimuli.

That means as long as a fetus is inside the womb up until just two weeks before its’ due date, a fetus cannot identify pain. It can’t differentiate pain from other stimuli. An aborted fetus cannot wax poetic on being betrayed by its mother. It can’t feel regret for not being born. It cannot know or even feel at the most basic level what is happening to it.

This research is obviously important for the proper treatment and development of preemies, but it also sheds some light on the “pro-life” movement’s greatest weapon; projecting human qualities onto something which is physiologically incapable of having them for the sole purpose of appealing to our emotions.

Useful to know.

Notes
  1. rockyhorrorpuppetshow reblogged this from romantics
  2. princessjinx reblogged this from chameleon-girl
  3. chameleon-girl reblogged this from propaganda-for-life
  4. thetimeforgutsandguil reblogged this from harrrymonster
  5. amykate28 reblogged this from propaganda-for-life and added:
    That’s actually really interesting.
  6. aswickedasyouare reblogged this from mixed-sage
  7. typewriterprose reblogged this from mondevivant
  8. mondevivant reblogged this from lentilbacon
  9. a-lion-named-lisa reblogged this from imnothayley
  10. thebastardizedmuse reblogged this from recursiveselfimprovement
  11. recursiveselfimprovement reblogged this from imnothayley
  12. imnothayley reblogged this from anxiouslyalex and added:
    This research is obviously important for the proper treatment and development of preemies, but it also sheds some light...
  13. anxiouslyalex reblogged this from doulaness
  14. veganmudblood reblogged this from veganemelda and added:
    Science, FTW. (As a preemie myself, I also get pretty pissed off when anti-choicers use premature babies as an example...
  15. mountlandme reblogged this from probablyhuman
  16. lifelessnolife reblogged this from true-neutral-good
  17. true-neutral-good reblogged this from the-science-alliance
  18. hotel-denouement reblogged this from gallows-bird
  19. gallows-bird reblogged this from probablyhuman
  20. probablyhuman reblogged this from bittergrapes
  21. asparklethatisblue reblogged this from unknown20troper
  22. the-science-alliance reblogged this from bittergrapes
  23. maggieconnelly reblogged this from bittergrapes
  24. sonicarcreactor reblogged this from fuckyeahchoice
  25. after-closing-time reblogged this from -lucid-
  26. -lucid- reblogged this from bittergrapes
  27. mixed-sage reblogged this from flappingphysicist